Comments on: Fedora 10 Review, and Feature Roundup http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/ Tracking the stories of the week for jupiterbroadcasting.com Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Redhat linux http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-3134 Redhat linux Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:15:11 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-3134 Wow! 11 times faster? That's what I like about the new improved Fedora<br>10. Wow! 11 times faster? That's what I like about the new improved Fedora
10.

]]> By: Fedora 10 Review | bin-false.org | TuxWire : The Linux Blog http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-2569 Fedora 10 Review | bin-false.org | TuxWire : The Linux Blog Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:18:22 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-2569 [...] See the original post:  Fedora 10 Review | bin-false.org [...] [...] See the original post:  Fedora 10 Review | bin-false.org [...]

]]> By: kris walker http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-2351 kris walker Sat, 02 May 2009 22:23:11 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-2351 Yes, flash, fancy, but impractical. This problem has started ever since Redhat 7. I'm really disappointed that this problem hasn't gone away. The Redhat team should be ashamed. I had two crippling problems with my latest Mar-May installs: (1) hang on install on Dell dimension 2350, most likely due to intel video chipset or something stupid like that, and (2) the stupid install program would not eject cd 1 so i could insert the rest of the cd's. Both problems are known about. But how goddamn stupid. You know, from the beginning of linux, we new that the older the machine, the better chance it would fare with installing linux on it since it allows a lot of time for driver development/contribution. The computer I just had problems with is a 5 to 8 year old Dell, with 2.1 GHz chip and only CD drives. And this does not work with the current Fedora 10 that everyone praises about and pats themselves on the back about. Nice job. From this point on, I've written off Fedora entirely and will never again waste countless hours on hoping for a miracle. I am hoping freebsd will be able to save me. Yes, flash, fancy, but impractical. This problem has started ever since Redhat 7. I’m really disappointed that this problem hasn’t gone away. The Redhat team should be ashamed. I had two crippling problems with my latest Mar-May installs: (1) hang on install on Dell dimension 2350, most likely due to intel video chipset or something stupid like that, and (2) the stupid install program would not eject cd 1 so i could insert the rest of the cd’s. Both problems are known about. But how goddamn stupid. You know, from the beginning of linux, we new that the older the machine, the better chance it would fare with installing linux on it since it allows a lot of time for driver development/contribution. The computer I just had problems with is a 5 to 8 year old Dell, with 2.1 GHz chip and only CD drives. And this does not work with the current Fedora 10 that everyone praises about and pats themselves on the back about. Nice job. From this point on, I’ve written off Fedora entirely and will never again waste countless hours on hoping for a miracle. I am hoping freebsd will be able to save me.

]]> By: Pukin' PR http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-1381 Pukin' PR Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:42:43 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-1381 I was wondering how Fedora 10 stacks up against Ubuntu 8.10. I have been using Ubuntu for about a year now. Is it any better or worse than Ubuntu, just curious. I was wondering how Fedora 10 stacks up against Ubuntu 8.10. I have been using Ubuntu for about a year now. Is it any better or worse than Ubuntu, just curious.

]]> By: Rahul Sundaram http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-719 Rahul Sundaram Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:48:51 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-719 My point is simply that, Fedora team's communication would include mine as well. I don't want a discussion here anyway. If there is a real concern, it is better expressed in the mailing list where the entire team can discuss the topic. Thanks for the feedback. My point is simply that, Fedora team’s communication would include mine as well. I don’t want a discussion here anyway. If there is a real concern, it is better expressed in the mailing list where the entire team can discuss the topic. Thanks for the feedback.

]]> By: chris http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-716 chris Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:38:53 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-716 @ Rahul Please don't start that discussion here. You can read Bryan's post on his blog to see what he/we are referring too. It goes far beyond the email updates you have sent us. You're email updates have been very helpful, and are not what the post is about. -Chris @ Rahul

Please don’t start that discussion here. You can read Bryan’s post on his blog to see what he/we are referring too. It goes far beyond the email updates you have sent us.

You’re email updates have been very helpful, and are not what the post is about.

-Chris

]]> By: Rahul Sundaram http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-715 Rahul Sundaram Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:48:15 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-715 "My attention turns from issues with the distribution, and more towards issues with the Fedora team’s poor communication" Such generalization is almost always missing the beat. I have send many mails to you folks adding more information and clarifying certain details and while it might not have been the best, I don't think it was poor communication either. If you do have issues, feel free to bring this topic in the fedora-marketing list where it can be a bilateral discussion instead of a blog post. “My attention turns from issues with the distribution, and more towards issues with the Fedora team’s poor communication”

Such generalization is almost always missing the beat. I have send many mails to you folks adding more information and clarifying certain details and while it might not have been the best, I don’t think it was poor communication either. If you do have issues, feel free to bring this topic in the fedora-marketing list where it can be a bilateral discussion instead of a blog post.

]]> By: Tweaking Windows » Post Topic » Fedora 10 Cambridge Released http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-706 Tweaking Windows » Post Topic » Fedora 10 Cambridge Released Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:36:35 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-706 [...] Linux magazine | Rock-solid Fedora 10 brings salvation to Ubuntu weary ? The Register | Fedora 10 Review | bin-false.org [...] [...] Linux magazine | Rock-solid Fedora 10 brings salvation to Ubuntu weary ? The Register | Fedora 10 Review | bin-false.org [...]

]]> By: chris http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-662 chris Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:53:35 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-662 @Tom Virt-Manager can manage Xen VMs: http://virt-manager.et.redhat.com/faq.html @Tom

Virt-Manager can manage Xen VMs:
http://virt-manager.et.redhat.com/faq.html

]]> By: Tom http://bin-false.org/fedora-10-review-and-feature-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-658 Tom Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:59:10 +0000 http://bin-false.org/?p=9#comment-658 Fedora 10 has no XEN! Virtmanager uses KVM. Fedora 10 has no XEN! Virtmanager uses KVM.

]]>